close logo

Part 12: Karma in Jainism – Bondage and liberation

Comparison Between Jain and Hindu Theory of Karma

Jainism and Hinduism, two major Indian religions, both include the concept of karma in their doctrines. While they share some similarities in understanding karma as a law of moral cause and effect, there are notable differences in their interpretations and applications. Here’s a comparison of the karma theories in Jainism and Hinduism:

Jain Karma Theory

1. Nature of Karma

– Physical Substance: Jainism views karma as a physical substance, a kind of subtle matter that adheres to the soul. Good or bad actions attract karmic particles that attach to the soul and affect its purity and liberation.

– Eight Types of Karma: Karmic particles are categorized into eight types, including those that obscure knowledge, cause delusion, affect lifespan, and influence experiences of pleasure and pain.

2. Mechanism of Karma

– Attraction and Bondage: Actions (thoughts, words, and deeds) produce vibrations in the soul, attracting karmic particles. These particles bind to the soul based on the nature and intensity of the action.

– Influence of Passions: Passions (kasayas) such as anger, pride, deceit, and greed intensify karmic bondage.

3. Path to Liberation

– Purification of the Soul: Liberation (moksha) involves the complete purification of the soul by shedding all karmic particles.

– Three Jewels: Achieved through right faith (samyak darshana), right knowledge (samyak jnana), and right conduct (samyak charitra).

– Austerities and Ethical Conduct: Emphasis on non-violence (ahimsa), strict ethical conduct, and austerities.

4. Deterministic and Ethical Aspects

– Determinism: The soul’s current state and future experiences are direct results of past actions.

– Strict Discipline: Ethical living and ascetic practices are crucial to control and shed karma.

Hindu Karma Theory

1. Nature of Karma

– Law of Moral Cause and Effect: Karma in Hinduism is a non-physical force that operates as a law of moral cause and effect, influencing an individual’s future experiences based on their actions.

– Three Types of Karma: Classified into sanchita (accumulated past karma), prarabdha (karma that is currently being experienced), and agami (future karma generated by current actions).

2. Mechanism of Karma

– Action and Reaction: Karma operates through the principle of cause and effect, where actions (good or bad) lead to corresponding outcomes in this life or future lives.

– Intention and Action: Both the intention behind actions and the actions themselves generate karma.

3. Path to Liberation

– Liberation (Moksha): Liberation is achieved by transcending karma through spiritual practices and realizing one’s true nature (atman) as being one with Brahman (the ultimate reality).

– Four Paths (Yogas):

– Karma Yoga: Path of selfless action and duty.

– Bhakti Yoga: Path of devotion and love for the divine.

– Jnana Yoga: Path of knowledge and wisdom.

– Raja Yoga: Path of meditation and mental discipline.

– Rituals and Dharma: Performance of rituals, adherence to dharma (righteousness and duty), and devotion are emphasized.

4. Deterministic and Ethical Aspects

– Influence of Free Will: While past actions influence one’s current state, individuals have the free will to change their future karma through righteous actions.

– Flexible Approach: Emphasizes the importance of intention, ethical living, and spiritual practices to mitigate negative karma and accumulate positive karma.

Key Differences

1. Nature of Karma

– Jainism: Karma is a physical substance that adheres to the soul.

– Hinduism: Karma is a non-physical law of moral cause and effect.

2. Role of Intentionality

– Jainism: All actions, including thoughts, words, and deeds, bind karma.

– Hinduism: Both intention and action are crucial in generating karma.

3. Approach to Liberation

– Jainism: Focus on shedding karmic particles through ascetic practices and strict ethical conduct.

– Hinduism: Emphasis on spiritual practices, devotion, knowledge, and righteous action to transcend karma.

4. Determinism vs. Free Will

– Jainism: More deterministic, stressing the direct impact of past actions on the soul’s current and future states.

– Hinduism: Balances determinism with the concept of free will, allowing individuals to change their karma through conscious effort and ethical behavior.

Conclusion

In summary, while both Jainism and Hinduism incorporate karma as a fundamental concept, their interpretations and practices reflect their unique philosophical and spiritual goals. Jainism’s karma theory is more material and deterministic, focusing on the purification of the soul, whereas Hinduism’s approach is more flexible, emphasizing the role of intention, ethical living, and various spiritual paths to transcend karma and achieve liberation.

…..Conclusion

Karma in Jainism

Feature Image Credit: istockphoto.com

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article belong to the author. Indic Today is neither responsible nor liable for the accuracy, completeness, suitability, or validity of any information in the article.