close logo

Apaurusheya Veda Part I

Every Hindu comes across these statements in a lifetime:

тАШVedas are nothing but a tool to deceive the masses, designed by Brahmins.
┬а ┬а ┬а ┬а ┬а ┬а ┬а ┬а ┬а ┬а ┬а ┬а ┬а ┬а ┬а ┬а ┬а ┬а ┬а ┬а ┬а ┬а ┬а ┬а ┬а ┬а ┬а ┬а and
тАШVedas are divine words. They are тАШApaurusheyaтАЩ that is nobody authored them.тАЩ

But the reality is that a vast majority of people claiming to profess either of these thoughts are mired in certain prejudices. The former thought is an outcome of ideological rivalry and the latter is a belief of people owing to their adherence to a certain creed.

Therefore it is very important for an average Hindu to know the traditional view on the meaning of Apaurusheya. It must be told what the actual connotations of this word are.

In order to understand a belief system, it is very important to understand:

  • Its notion of the ultimate goal.
  • Its take about the world and
  • Its view of beings.
  • The Buddhists are vij├▒─Бnavadis. (рд╡рд┐рдЬреНрдЮрд╛рдирд╡рд╛рджреА) They opine world nothing but individual’s perception). тАШShoonyaтАЩ (vacuum) is the only reality that is to be known.
  • The Jains believe the world is made up of Pudgalas (one of the material causes of world in Jainism). Individuals escape the cycle of birth and rebirth via penance and practice. They do not believe in a god who creates this arrangement.
  • Abrahamic faiths like Christianity and Islam accept that God created the world. God is an extra-cosmic entity. On the last Day of Judgment, beings go to hell and heaven.

Now let us see what the Vedas have to say about the ultimate, ordinary beings and the world. A set of questions and their answers in the KenopanishadтАЩs inception mantras will shed some light on the supreme of the Vedas.

рдХреЗрдиреЗрд╖рд┐рддрдВ рдкрддрддрд┐ рдкреНрд░реЗрд╖рд┐рддрдВ рдордирдГ рдХреЗрди рдкреНрд░рд╛рдгрдГ рдкреНрд░рдердордГ рдкреНрд░реИрддрд┐ рдпреБрдХреНрддрдГ ред
рдХреЗрдиреЗрд╖рд┐рддрд╛рдВ рд╡рд╛рдЪрдорд┐рдорд╛рдВ рд╡рджрдиреНрддрд┐ рдЪрдХреНрд╖реБрдГ рд╢реНрд░реЛрддреНрд░рдВ рдХ рдЙ рджреЗрд╡реЛ рдпреБрдирдХреНрддрд┐ редред

(Willed by whom does the directed mind go towards its object? Being directed by whom does the vital force that precedes all, proceed (towards its duty)? By whom is this speech willed that people utter? Who is the effulgent being who directs the eyes and the ears?)

рд╢реНрд░реЛрддреНрд░рд╕реНрдп рд╢реНрд░реЛрддреНрд░рдВ рдордирд╕реЛ рдордиреЛ рдпрджреНрд╡рд╛рдЪреЛ рд╣ рд╡рд╛рдЪреНрдБрд╕ рдЙ рдкреНрд░рд╛рдгрд╕реНрдп рдкреНрд░рд╛рдгрдГред
рдЪрдХреНрд╖реБрд╖рд╢реНрдЪрдХреНрд╖реБрд░рддрд┐рдореБрдЪреНрдп рдзреАрд░рд╛рдГ рдкреНрд░реЗрддреНрдпрд╛рд╕реНрдорд╛рд▓реНрд▓реЛрдХрд╛рджрдореГрддрд╛ рднрд╡рдиреНрддрд┐ редред

(It is the ear of the ear, the mind of the mind, tongue of the tongue (the speech of speech), and also the life of the life and eye of the eye. Having abandoned (the sense of self or I-ness in these) and arising above sense-life, the wise become immortal.)

рди рддрддреНрд░ рдЪрдХреНрд╖реБрд░реНрдЧрдЪреНрдЫрддрд┐ рди рд╡рд╛рдЧреНрдЧрдЪреНрдЫрддрд┐ рдиреЛ рдордиреЛ рди рд╡рд┐рджреНрдореЛ рди рд╡рд┐рдЬрд╛рдиреАрдореЛ рдпрдереИрддрджрдиреБрд╢рд┐рд╖реНрдпрд╛рддреН редред

(The eye does not go there, no speech, nor the mind. We do not, therefore, know how to instruct one about it)

рдЕрдиреНрдпрджреЗрд╡ рддрджреНрд╡рд┐рджрд┐рддрд╛рджрдереЛ рдЕрд╡рд┐рджрд┐рддрд╛рджрдзрд┐ред
рдЗрддрд┐ рд╢реБрд╢реНрд░реБрдо рдкреВрд░реНрд╡реЗрд╖рд╛рдВ рдпреЗ рдирд╕реНрддрджреНрд╡реНрдпрд╛рдЪрдЪрдХреНрд╖рд┐рд░реЗ редред

(It is different from what is known and it is beyond what is unknown. Thus we have heard from the ancient preceptors who taught us that.)

рдпрджреНрд╡рд╛рдЪрд╛рд╜рдирднреНрдпреБрджрд┐рддрдВ рдпреЗрди рд╡рд╛рдЧрднреНрдпреБрджреНрдпрддреЗ ред
рддрджреЗрд╡ рдмреНрд░рд╣реНрдо рддреНрд╡рдВ рд╡рд┐рджреНрдзрд┐ рдиреЗрджрдВ рдпрджрд┐рджрдореБрдкрд╛рд╕рддреЗред

(What speech does not enlighten, but what enlightens speech, know that alone as Brahm, and not this which people worship here)

рдпрдиреНрдордирд╕рд╛ рди рдордиреБрддреЗ рдпреЗрдирд╛рд╣реБрд░реНрдордиреЛ рдорддрдореН ред
рддрджреЗрд╡ рдмреНрд░рд╣реНрдо рддреНрд╡рдВ рд╡рд┐рджреНрдзрд┐ рдиреЗрджрдВ рдпрджрд┐рджрдореБрдкрд╛рд╕рддреЗ┬аред

(What one cannot think with the mind, but by which they say that the mind is made to think, know that alone as Brahm, and not this which people here worship.)

So here certain questions have been raised as to what is it, driven by which mind and the body are acting the way they act. What is it which is neither the senses nor the sensory potentials, but by which these two are able to carry out their functions?

This cause has been addressed as тАШBrahmтАЩ (рдмреНрд░рд╣реНрдо). Contemplation on this тАШBrahmтАЩ will pave our way to the true meaning of the aforesaid тАШApaurusheyaтАЩ. In the language of the Vedas тАШBrahm’ is our own self -рдЖрддреНрдорд╛ (Aatma). And everything we perceive is in fact тАШBrahmтАЩ only-рд╕рд░реНрд╡рдВ рд╣реНрдпреЗрддрджреН рдмреНрд░рд╣реНрдорд╛рдпрдорд╛рддреНрдорд╛ рдмреНрд░рд╣реНрдо тАУMandukya Upanishad-2.

Vedic seers proposed that nobody has seen the time when creation began. And nobody can look into in the future. Various takes regarding the origin and the dissolution are mere assumptions. The present, the past, the future have no meaning unless тАШIтАЩ exist. The directions and sub directions begin with тАШmeтАЩ. The vivid displays of nature are nowhere without me.

For example, you see a leaf. The leaf is seen by the тАШnetrendriyaтАЩ (eyes). The тАШnetrakara vrittiтАЩ (inclination formed by the vision) is there in the mind. The substratum and illuminator of this vritti is where the leaf is created. Thus without which the leaf cannot be established, is the cause of the leaf. It is the J├▒─Бna (рдЬреНрдЮрд╛рди) which established the object.

The self is pure intelligence which establishes things via the senses, the mind, and the intellect. So we can say J├▒─Бna is the instrument that leads to the world. Without the trio of the knower (рдЬреНрдЮрд╛рддрд╛), known (рдЬреНрдЮреЗрдп ) and J├▒─Бna (рдЬреНрдЮрд╛рди) there is no world. As already mentioned the diverse objects that are perceived as separate from the knower are established by the J├▒─Бna.

It means the object as it is known, is not outside.┬аIt is J├▒─Бna which is pervading the object. And vritti arising due to J├▒─Бna creates the object as it is known. Therefore it is fitting that J├▒─Бna is also the material cause (upaadaana karna) of creation. The J├▒─Бna imbued with samskara (mental inclinations) is Manas (рдорди).

J├▒─Бna with dormant samskaras is Chitta (рдЪрд┐рддреНрдд). Intellect (рдмреБрджреНрдзрд┐) is J├▒─Бna unaffected with samskaras. Ahamnkara (рдЕрд╣рдВрдХрд╛рд░) is J├▒─Бna which causes a false sense of individuality. The ultimate рдкреНрд░рдорд╛рдг (proof) in establishing all these is J├▒─Бna itself. J├▒─Бna which devoid of the distinction of knower and the known is Aatma (рдЖрддреНрдорд╛) or self, in which all the aforesaid dualities of knower and known are superimposed:

рд╡рджрдВрддрд┐ рддрддреНрд╡рд╡рд┐рджрд╕реНрддрддреНрд╡рдВ рдпрдЬреНрдЬреНрдЮрд╛рдирдорджреНрд╡рдпрдореНред
рдмреНрд░рд╣реНрдореЗрддрд┐ рдкрд░рдорд╛рддреНрдореЗрддрд┐ рднрдЧрд╡рд╛рдиреАрддреА рд╢рдмреНрджреНрдпрддреЗредред
Shrimad Bhagavatam- 1.2.11

(Knowers of reality address the non-dual J├▒─Бna as tattva (essence). The same has been called brahm, bhagvana, paramatma.)

Regarding the J├▒─Бna Swaroopa Atma, Shri Krishna says in the Bhagvad Gita 2.17 тАУ

рдЕрд╡рд┐рдирд╛рд╢рд┐ рддреБ рддрджреНрд╡рд┐рджреНрдзрд┐ рдпреЗрди рд╕рд░реНрд╡рдорд┐рджрдВ рддрддрдореНред
рд╡рд┐рдирд╛рд╢рдорд╡реНрдпрдпрд╛рд╕реНрдп рди рдХрд╢реНрдЪрд┐рддреН рдХрд░реНрддреБрдорд░реНрд╣рддрд┐редред

(Know that to be indestructible by which all this (creation) is pervaded, no one can cause the destruction of that imperishable)

Which is why Shruti too says in the Kathopanishad тАУ

рдЬрд╛рдпрддреЗ рдореНрд░рд┐рдпрддреЗ рд╡рд╛ рд╡рд┐рдкрд╢реНрдЪрд┐рдиреНрдирд╛рдпрдВ рдХреБрддрд╢реНрдЪрд┐рдиреНрди рдмрднреВрд╡ рдХрд╢реНрдЪрд┐рддреНред
рдЕрдЬреЛ рдирд┐рддреНрдпрдГ рд╢рд╛рд╢реНрд╡рддреЛрд╜рдпрдВ рдкреБрд░рд╛рдгреЛ рди рд╣рдиреНрдпрддреЗ рд╣рдиреНрдпрдорд╛рдиреЗ рд╢рд░реАрд░реЗ редред
Kathopanishad- 1.2.18

(The intelligent Aatma is not born, nor does it die, it did not spring from anything, and nothing sprang from it. It is unborn, eternal, everlasting, and ancient. It is not slain although the body is slain.)

That which superimposes its own qualities on something else owing to its proximity with that something else is called тАШUpadhi‘ (рдЙрдкрд╛рдзрд┐- рдЙрдк рд╕рдореАрдкреЗ рд╕реНрдерд┐рддреНрд╡рд╛ рдЖрдзрд┐рдореН). The thing which is superimposed is Upadhi, and upon which it is superimposed is Upahita (рдЙрдкрд╣рд┐рдд). Upadhi does not penetrate upahita. An analogy of space in a pot and monastery is given to explain it.

Just as space in a pot (рдШрдЯрд╛рдХрд╛рд╢) is the same as the space outside the pot (рдорд╣рд╛рдХрд╛рд╢), yet there is a distinction between the two because the pot is Upadhi and space is Upahita. The same is applicable to the space in a monastery (рдордард╛рдХрд╛рд╢).

These seemingly distinct spaces are due to Upadhis of Ghata and Matha. From the vantage point of space, there is no distinction. It is space only which is pervading in its uupadhis, yet it is separate from them.

Similarly, Manas, buddhi, Chitta, Ahamnkara, J├▒─Бnaendriya рдЬреНрдЮрд╛рдиреЗрдиреНрджреНрд░реАрдп), Karmendriya (рдХрд░реНрдореЗрдиреНрджреНрд░реАрдп), Tanamatras (рддрдиреНрдорд╛рддреНрд░рд╛-sensory potentials) are upadhis for J├▒─Бna Swaroopa Aatma ( рдЬреНрдЮрд╛рди рд╕реНрд╡рд░реВрдк рдЖрддреНрдорд╛). And only due to these upadhis the world is perceived the way we know it. This superimposition is the cause of all interactions. All interaction is due to Vishaya (рд╡рд┐рд╖рдп- object) and Vishayee (рд╡рд┐рд╖рдпреА-one who is aware of Vishays). Vishayas are many, Vishayee is one.

Vishayas are insentient and Vishayee is sentient. Unless Aatma identifies itself as senses, it cannot become the doer (рдХрд░реНрддрд╛). Unless it identifies with the aforesaid four-fold mind comprising of Manas, Buddhi, etc, it cannot become Bhokta (рднреЛрдХреНрддрд╛- one who experiences the world).

The real nature of Atma is conscious, which is neither karta nor bhokta but рджреНрд░рд╖реНрдЯрд╛ (one who sees or knows).

рд╕рд╛рдХреНрд╖реА рдЪреЗрддрд╛ рдХреЗрд╡рд▓реЛ рдирд┐рд░реНрдЧреБрдгрд╢реНрдЪред
Shvetashvatara Upanishad- 6.11.

J├▒─Бna Swaroopa Aatma is the illuminator of all the upadhis and it is still separate from all of them. Without Atma, they have no independent existence of their own. J├▒─Бna is its own proof. It is not proved by anything else. For concluding anything, J├▒─Бna is the ultimate tool.

The Parramatta (рдкреНрд░рдорд╛рддрд╛-one who proves), the Pramaana ( рдкреНрд░рдорд╛рдг- the proof), and Prameya (рдкреНрд░рдореЗрдп-the proved) are also established only by J├▒─Бna. Pramana does not establish J├▒─Бna but J├▒─Бna establishes Pramanas.

Now talking about time. If we consider that J├▒─Бna arises and dies in the stream of time and is transient then we are resorting to the Buddhist belief of Shunyata. But the Vedic view is that time is not separate from J├▒─Бna. If the time has divisions or parts, then its J├▒─Бna which establishes them.

If there are no divisions in time, then there is no question of its various units, or past and the future. If we say there was a time when time did not exist, then the time in which we imagine the absence of time, will be in time, which will be established by J├▒─Бna only.

Similarly, J├▒─Бna is not divided by space. As it has been established that J├▒─Бna and time are not separate, the space arising in such a time too will not be different from J├▒─Бna. The absence of space will be imagined in space called J├▒─Бna only. The same is applicable to the objects arising in such a space.

So the Prakashaka (рдкреНрд░рдХрд╛рд╢рдХ) of space (рджреЗрд╢), time (рдХрд╛рд▓), mental inclinations (рд╡реГрддреНрддрд┐s), and sense of individuality in a state of being awake, in dreams and in deep sleep is J├▒─Бna Swaroopa Aatma-non-dual consciousness. The Chetana (consciousness) whose Upadhi is Man, Buddhi, Chitta, Aham, senses, Prana (vital force), the body is Jeeva (рдЬреАрд╡).

Chetan whose Upadhi is Universe (рдмреНрд░рд╣реНрдорд╛рдгреНрдб) is Ishwara (рдИрд╢реНрд╡рд░). The nature of both Jeeva and Ishwara is the same, that is J├▒─Бna Swaroop. But the seeming difference is due to Upadhi. To explain this another analogy is given:

рдЬрд▓рд╛рд╢рдпреЗ рдорд╣рд╛рдХрд╛рд╢рд╕реНрддрджрд╡рдЪреНрдЫрд┐рдиреНрди рдПрд╡ рд╣рд┐ред рдкреНрд░рддрд┐рдмрд┐рдореНрдмрд╛рдЦреНрдпрдордкрд░рдВ рджреГрд╢реНрдпрддреЗ рддреНрд░рд┐рд╡рд┐рдзрдВ рдирднрдГредред
рдмреБрджреНрдзрдпрд╡рдЪреНрдЫрд┐рдиреНрдирдЪреИрддрдиреНрдпрдореЗрдХрдВ рдкреВрд░реНрдгрдордерд╛рдкрд░рдореНред рдЖрднрд╛рд╕рд╕реНрддреНрд╡рдкрд░рдВ рдмрд┐рдореНрдмрднреВрддрдореЗрд╡рдВ рддреНрд░рд┐рдзрд╛ рдЪрд┐рддрд┐рдГ-

(Just as space in pond and space others are the same in nature, yet they are considered different. Similarly, the consciousness with the body and outside the body is of the same nature. And just as a reflection of space is seen on the surface of the pond, a reflection of consciousness in рдЕрдВрддрдГрдХрд░рдг or fourfold mind is рдЪрд┐рджрд╛рднрд╛рд╕ (sense of individuality ) тАУ Adhyatma Ramayana 1.45…

What is Prana (рдкреНрд░рд╛рдг) for Jeeva, is Sutratma (рд╕реВрддреНрд░рд╛рддреНрдорд╛) for Ishwara. Similarly, Digdevta (рджрд┐рдЧреНрджреЗрд╡рддрд╛), Vaayu (рд╡рд╛рдпреБ), Surya (рд╕реВрд░реНрдп), Varuna (рд╡рд░реБрдг), Bhudevi (рднреВ рджреЗрд╡реА), Agni (рдЕрдЧреНрдирд┐), Indra (рдЗрдиреНрджреНрд░), Vishnu (рд╡рд┐рд╖реНрдгреБ), Prajapati (рдкреНрд░рдЬрд╛рдкрддрд┐) and Mitra (рдорд┐рддреНрд░), are faculties for sound, touch, vision, taste, smell, speech, action, motion, procreation and excretion respectively. (Suta Samhita-4.4.23-24)

Similarly, Chandra (рдЪрдиреНрджреНрд░) is Manas. Brahma (рдмреНрд░рд╣реНрдорд╛) is Buddhi, Rudra (рд░реБрджреНрд░) is Ahamnkara, Vasudev (рд╡рд╛рд╕реБрджреЗрд╡) is Chitta. (Bhagwata– 3.6.23-26). A similar mention appears in Suta Samhita-4.4.26-27, with Chitta as Shiva (рд╢рд┐рд╡).

At the level of Jeeva, Shruti says-

рдЗрдиреНрджреНрд░рд┐рдпреЗрднреНрдпрдГ рдкрд░рд╛ рд╣реНрдпрд░реНрдерд╛ рдЕрд░реНрдереЗрднреНрдпрд╢реНрдЪ рдкрд░рдВ рдордирдГред рдордирд╕реНрддреБ рдкрд░рд╛ рдмреБрджреНрдзрд┐рд░реНрдмреБрджреНрдзреЗрд░рд╛рддреНрдорд╛ рдорд╣рд╛рдиреНрдкрд░рдГред
Kathopanishad- 1.3.10

(Beyond the senses, are the rudiments of its objects, beyond these rudiments is Manas, beyond Manas is Buddhi, and beyond the Buddhi is Aatma.)

At the level of Ishwar, things are like this тАУ

рднрдпрд╛рджрд╕реНрдпрд╛рдЧреНрдирд┐рд╕реНрддрдкрддрд┐ рднрдпрд╛рддреНрддрдкрддрд┐ рд╕реВрд░реНрдпрдГред рднрдпрд╛рджрд┐рдиреНрджреНрд░рд╢реНрдЪ рд╡рд╛рдпреБрд╢реНрдЪ рдореГрддреНрдпреБрд░реНрдзрд╛рд╡рддрд┐ рдкрдЮреНрдЪрдордГредред
Kathopanishad 2.3.3

(From the fear of it (рдмреНрд░рд╣реНрдо), Agni burns, from fear, the Surya shines, from fear Indra, Vaayu, and death the fifth, speeds.)

A similar example is seen in the Kenopnishad where рдмреНрд░рд╣реНрдо assumes the form of Yaksha and shatters the egos of the Devtas.

The same рдмреНрд░рд╣реНрдо assumes the form of Vishnu, Shiva, Devi, Indra, etc. because it is J├▒─Бna Swaroop-

рдЕрдпрдВ рдмреНрд░рд╣реНрдорд╛ рд╢рд┐рд╡реЛ рд╡рд┐рд╖реНрдгреБрд░рдпрдорд┐рдиреНрджреНрд░рдГ рдкреНрд░рдЬрд╛рдкрддрд┐ред
рдЕрдпрдВ рд╡рд╛рдпреБрд░ рдЪрд╛рдЧреНрдирд┐рд░рдпрдВ рд╕рд░реНрд╡рд╛рд╢реНрдЪ рджреЗрд╡рддрд╛рдГред
Suta Samhita- 2.10.36

(It (рдмреНрд░рд╣реНрдо) is Brahm─Б, it is Shiva, it is Vishnu, Indra, Prajapati. It is Vaayu, it is Agni and it is all the Devtas)

Therefore it is said-

рдЬреНрдЮрд╛рдирд╕реНрд╡рд░реВрдкрдВ рдЕрдЦрд┐рд▓рдВ рдЬрдЧрджреЗрддрдмреБрджреНрдзрдпрдГред рдЕрд░реНрде рд╕реНрд╡рд░реВрдкрдВ рдкрд╢реНрдпрдиреНрддреЛ рднреНрд░рд╛рдореНрдпрдиреНрддреЗ рдореЛрд╣рд╕рдореНрдкрд▓рд╡реЗредред

(All that exists is J├▒─Бna, ignorance sees diversity due to its own attachments- Vishnu Purana- 1.4.40)

Knowing all this, we conclude that at the root of the entire Prapancha (рдкреНрд░рдкрдВрдЪ) we have J├▒─Бna, which can neither be created nor be destroyed. Not even Ishwara can destroy J├▒─Бna. Sages raise a question that if Ishwara can create and destroy J├▒─Бna, then it must be ignorant before creating J├▒─Бna. If it had no J├▒─Бna then how could it create anything. Being J├▒─Бna Swaroop is lakashna (рд▓рдХреНрд╖рдг) of рдмреНрд░рд╣реНрдо. Brahm is the root of sense of Individuality or Chidabhas. Jagrit (рдЬрд╛рдЧреГрдд– awake state) is result of sense of individuality in gross body, senses and fourfold mind. Dream state is work of sense of individuality in sublte body (рд╕реВрдХреНрд╖реНрдо рд╢рд░реАрд░) comprising of senses and fourfold mind. This Chidabhas get dissolved in Sushupti (рд╕реБрд╖реБрдкреНрддрд┐– deep sleep). As already said, this Chidabhas only leads to perception of individual intellect (Buddhi) and individual desires in non-dual reality. It gets merged in Praagya (рдкреНрд░рд╛рдЬреНрдЮ) in deep sleep. This Praagya has been addressed as Ishwara or Turiya Brahm ( рддреБрд░реАрдп рдмреНрд░рд╣реНрдо) by the Shruti- Mandukya Upanishad 5.

The mental activities of Jagrit and Swapna states, with objects and their perciever, are not there in Sushupti. There is neither J├▒─Бt─Б nor J├▒eya. There is only awareness of absence of Prapancha. At the universal level, it is called Maha Pralaya( рдорд╣рд╛рдкреНрд░рд▓рдп)- the great dissolution.

There is only effortless Sukha (bliss) in this state. There is neither J├▒─Бt─Б nor J├▒eya. There is only awareness of Sukha. At a universal level, it is called Maha Pralaya (рдорд╣рд╛рдкреНрд░рд▓рдп)- great dissolution.

It is Praagya in which these names and forms get dissolved at individual level. At universal level, Ishwara is place of immersion of all names and forms. Just as at waking up all inclinations, desires, etc. wake up with us, similarly at universal level all the forms and intellects rise again. Actually this entire creation with names and forms is work of Buddhi.

рдЗрддрд┐ рддрдиреНрдордпрдореИрд╡реЗрддрддреН рд╕рд░реНрд╡реЗ рд╕реНрдерд╛рд╡рд░рдЬрдВрдЧрдордореНредрдкреНрд░рд▓реАрдпрддреЗ рдЪреЛрджреНрднрд╡рддрд┐ рддрд╕реНрдорд╛рдиреНрдирд┐рд░реНрджрд┐рд╖реНрдпрддреЗ рддрдерд╛редред
Mahabharat- Shanti Parva,194,18

(This entire creation rises with the rise of Buddhi and is dissolved with its dissolution. This creation is hence work of Buddhi).

The connection between object and what it is called also arises.

рдирд╛рдорд░реВрдкреЗ рд╡реНрдпрд╛рдХрд░рд╡рд╛рдгреА- Chandogya Upanishad- 6.3.2

The link between Names and forms is formed by Buddhi (intellect) via words (рд╢рдмреНрдж). The Vedas, the physical world, things beyond this physical world are the outcome of Buddhi. As already said , the universal Buddhi is рдмреНрд░рд╣реНрдорд╛ (Brahm─Б) or Hiranyagarbha (рд╣рд┐рд░рдгреНрдпрдЧрд░реНрдн). That is what Shruti itself says that рдмреНрд░рд╣реНрдо is the root of Hiranyagarbha (universal Buddhi) and it activates the Vedas for it.

рдпреЛ рдмреНрд░рд╣реНрдорд╛рдгрдВ рд╡рд┐рджрдзрд╛рддрд┐ рдкреВрд░реНрд╡рдВ рдпреЛ рд╡реИ рд╡реЗрджрд╛рдВрд╢реНрдЪ рдкреНрд░рдгрд┐рд╣реЛрддрд┐ рддрд╕реНрдореИред
Svetashvatra Upanishad- 6.18

This concept is explained in Puranas in form of stories. You can see Brahm giving Veda J├▒─Бna to Brahm─Б (рдмреНрд░рд╣реНрдорд╛) at the onset of the kalpa. Somewhere Shiva is Brahm, somewhere Narayana is supreme.

At our level the Vedas reside in Manomaya Kosha (рдордиреЛрдордп рдХреЛрд╢). As the Taitiriya Upanishad states, the Vedas reside in Manomaya Kosha.

рддрд╕реНрдп рдпрдЬреБрд░реЗрд╡ рд╢рд┐рд░рдГредрдЛрдЧреНрджрдХреНрд╖рд┐рдгрдГ рдкрдХреНрд╖рдГред рд╕рд╛рдореЛрддреНрддрд░рдГ рдкрдХреНрд╖рдГред
рдЖрджреЗрд╢ рдЖрддреНрдорд╛ ред рдЕрдерд░реНрд╡рд╛рдЩреНрдЧрд┐рд░рд╕рдГ рдкреБрдЪреНрдЫрдВ рдкреНрд░рддрд┐рд╖реНрдард╛ ред
рддрджрдкреНрдпреЗрд╖ рд╢реНрд▓реЛрдХреЛ рднрд╡рддрд┐ рее
Taitriya Upanishad-2.3.1

(Yajurmantras constitute the head of Manomaya Purusha (рдкреБрд░реБрд╖), Rig mantras are its right-wing, Sama mantras constitute its left-wing, the Brahmana portion is its trunk, Atharvaangrisa mantras are the tail.)

The J├▒─Бna of being J├▒─Бnaendriyas, Manas and feeling of тАШI’ and тАШmine’ constitute manomaya kosh. There are 5 sheaths in which Atma seems to be hidden. Annamaya Kosha (рдЕрдиреНрдирдордп рдХреЛрд╢), Pranamaya kosha (рдкреНрд░рд╛рдгрдордп рдХреЛрд╢), Manomaya kosha (рдордиреЛрдордп рдХреЛрд╢), Vij├▒─Бnamaya Kosha (рд╡рд┐рдЬреНрдЮрд╛рдирдордп рдХреЛрд╢) and Anandmaya Kosha. (рдЖрдирдВрджрдордп рдХреЛрд╢). They are not literal layers.

It is just name given to different manifestations of J├▒─Бna due to Upadhis. The gross body (рд╕реНрдереВрд▓ рд╢рд░реАрд░ ) is Annamaya.The vital force of life (рдкреНрд░рд╛рдг) imbued in senses of action constitutes Pranamaya Kosha. Vij├▒─Бnamaya Kosha is constituted by Budhhi imbued with Vrittis and J├▒─Бnaendriyas. The Anandmaya Kosha is known in Samadhi (рд╕рдорд╛рдзрд┐), or Sushupti, that is in absence of Vrittis.

The J├▒─Бna of a normal individual is such that he/she identifies himself/herself as Annamaya. Now let us understand what Veda being in Manomaya Kosha implies. There are 4 states of Shabda- рд╢рдмреНрдж (sound). The most subtle and sublime state is called рдкрд░рд╛ (Para). Forget about common people, even great sages rarely get to know this form of Shabda.

A lower level than this is Pashyanti (рдкрд╢реНрдпрдиреНрддреА). At this level Shabda becomes manifest. Then there is the Madhayama (рдордзреНрдпрдорд╛) state of Shabda, which is less subtle. Then there is the Vaikhri (рд╡реИрдЦрд░реА) state. It is the state in which Shabda is known to a common individual. The languages we speak and know are the Vaikhri level manifestation of Shabda.

When Chitta is taken from Vaikhri to Madhyama,from Madhyama to Pashyanti and finally to the Para state, then Veda mantras are seen within. That is why рдЛрд╖рд┐s (Rishis) are called Mantra Drashtas (рдордиреНрддреНрд░ рджреНрд░рд╖реНрдЯрд╛) тАУ seers of Mantra, and not creators of Mantra. They do Sakshatakara (рд╢рд╛рдХреНрд╖рд╛рддрдХрд╛рд░) or direct experience of mantras at higher level of Prana and Chitta.

The form of Veda that we know is the Vaikhri level manifestation. The Rigveda itself testifies all this-

рдЪрддреНрд╡рд╛рд░рд┐ рд╡рд╛рдХреН рдкрд░рд┐рдорд┐рддрд╛ рдкрджрд╛рдирд┐ рддрд╛рдирд┐ рд╡рд┐рджреБрд░реНрдмреНрд░рд╛рд╣реНрдордгрд╛ рдпреЗ рдордиреАрд╖рд┐рдгрдГред
рдЧреБрд╣рд╛ рддреНрд░реАрдгрд┐ рдирд┐рд╣рд┐рддрд╛ рдиреЗрдВрдЧрдпрдиреНрддрд┐ рддреБрд░реАрдпрдВ рд╡рд╛рдЪреЛ рдордиреБрд╖реНрдпрд╛ рд╡рджрдиреНрддрд┐редред
Rigveda-1.164.64

Veda means- J├▒─Бna (рдЬреНрдЮрд╛рди), which is inherent in all knowledge- рдкреНрд░рддрд┐рд╡реЛрдзрд╡рд┐рджрд┐рддрдореН рдорддрдореН– Kena Upanishad тАУ 2.4редред A part of this J├▒─Бna is Rig, Yajur, Sama and Atharva mantras. Which is why a story comes in Taitriya Aranayaka, wherein Bhardwaj observes рдмреНрд░рд╣реНрдордЪрд░реНрдп to see the end of Vedas. Indra appeared and granted him a handful of soil from three mountains, whose peaks could not be seen. He said that these mountains are Vedas, what I gave is sufficient for humans- рдЕрдирдВрддрд╛ рд╡реИ рд╡реЗрджрд╛ред Which is why the Veda has been called the life breath of the Ishwahara.

рдЕрд╕реНрдп рдорд╣рддреЛ рднреВрддрд╕реНрдп рдирд┐рд╢реНрд╡рд╕рд┐рддрдореЗрддрджреНрдпрджреГрдЧреНрд╡реЗрджреЛ рдпрдЬреБрд░реНрд╡реЗрджрдГ рд╕рд╛рдорд╡реЗрджреЛрд╜рдерд░реНрд╡рд╛рдВрдЩреНрдЧрд┐рд░рд╕ред
Brihadaranyak Upanishad- 2.4.10

Therefore it does not matter at which point of time the Rishis saw mantras, when the Vedas were written in the Vaikhri manifestation. The Vaikhri manifestation of Vedas comes into existence via the vagendriya ( рд╡рд╛рдЧреЗрдиреНрджреНрд░реАрдп), sense for speech. Hence it is born in space and time and is destructible too.

рдЛрдЪреЛ рдпрдЬреВрдВрд╖рд┐ рд╕рд╛рдорд╛рдЬрд┐рдХ рд╢рд░реАрд░рд╛рдгрд┐ рд╡реНрдпрдкрд╛рд╢реНрд░рд┐рддрд╛рдГред рдЬрд┐рд╣реНрд╡рд╛рдЧреНрд░реЗрд╖реБ рдкреНрд░рд╡рд░реНрддрдиреНрддреЗ рдпрддреНрдирд╕рд╛рдзреНрдпрд╛ рд╡рд┐рдирд╛рд╢рд┐рдирдГред
Mahabharat, Shanti Parva, 205,16

(The Rik, yajush ana Sama mantras are dependent on body. They are manifested at the tongue, imbibed via practice and are ephemeral like other things born in space and time)

They stay тАШapaurusheyaтАЩ because no one can create J├▒─Бna nor can anyone destroy it. Which is why Veda called Shabda Brahm. This sublime principle is not a hindrance to any scientific or historical proposition. Theories may come and go but the principle of Vaidikas remains unaffected. Hence Vyasa rightly says about рдмреНрд░рд╣реНрдо in his рдмреНрд░рд╣реНрдо рд╕реВрддреНрд░ тАУ

рдЬрдиреНрдорд╛рджреНрдпрд╕реНрдп рдпрддрдГ– its non-dual substratum in which рдЬрдиреНрдорд╛рджрд┐– origin, sustenance, dissolution happpen- 1.1.2

рд╢рд╛рд╕реНрддреНрд░рдпреЛрдирд┐рддреНрд╡рд╛рдд– its womb of all Shastras.1.1.3

(Editor’s note: This article has been edited on August 31st 2020 as per author’s directions in some places for reader clarity)

 

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article belong to the author. Indic Today is neither responsible nor liable for the accuracy, completeness, suitability, or validity of any information in the article.

Leave a Reply